تحلیل فضایی تاب آوری معیشت نواحی روستایی (مورد پژوهی:روستاهای پیرامون دریاچه ارومیه،شهرستان ارومیه)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه خوارزمی

JGET-2009-1188(R1)

چکیده

هدف مطالعه حاضر تحلیل فضایی تاب آوری معیشت روستاهای پیرامون دریاچه ارومیه با توجه به شاخص های موثر می باشد تا سطح فضایی برخورداری روستاها به لحاظ تاب آوری روستاها مشخص گردد، پژوهش از نوع کاربردی و از نظر روش و ماهیت توصیفی -تحلیلی بوده،جامعه آماری روستاهای پیرامون دریاچه ارومیه می باشد که به منظور تحلیل کمی داده ها از تکنیک چندمعیاره تاپسیس براساس وزن دهی متخصصان به شاخص ها و معیارها استفاده شد. در بررسی جداگانه هر یک از ابعاد تاب آوری معیشت نتایج گویای این بود که در بُعد اقتصادی(12روستا دارای سطح تاب آوری نامناسب،3روستا تاب آوری متوسط و 3روستا دارای تاب آوری مناسب)، در بُعد اجتماعی(2روستا تاب آوری متوسط،8روستا تاب آوری مناسب و 8 روستا تاب آوری نامناسب )؛در بُعد کالبدی-فیزیکی(10روستا تاب آوری نامناسب،2روستا تاب آوری متوسط و 6روستا تاب آوری مناسب)،و در بُعد محیطی-اکولوژیکی(14روستا تاب آوری مناسب،1روستا تاب آوری متوسط و 3روستا دارای تاب آوری نامناسب)هستند. در کل در ابعاد اقتصادی (3505.)، و کالبدی(3945.) سطح تاب آوری ضعیف ، و در ابعاد اجتماعی(4675.)، و محیطی-اکولوژیکی(5332.) در سطح متوسط از تاب آوری معیشت می باشند؛ بنابراین می‌توان این‌گونه استنتاج نمود که شاخص های مختلف تاب‌آوری تأثیرات متفاوتی بر میزان تاب‌آوری روستاهای پیرامون دریاچه ارومیه داشته‌اند و با تغییرات وضعیت این شاخص ها در سطوح مختلف وضعیت تاب‌آوری نیز تغییر خواهد نمود و شاهد تاب آوری متفاوتی در منطقه خواهیم بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Spatial analysis of livelihood resilience in rural areas (Case study: villages around Lake Urmia, Urmia city)

نویسندگان [English]

  • mahbob babaei 1
  • Hamid Jalalian 2
  • Hasan afrakhtehh 1
1 khrazmie
2 Academic Staff of Kharazmi University
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study is to analyze the spatial resilience of the villages around Lake Urmia according to the effective indicators to determine the spatial level of the villages in terms of The research is of applied type and in terms of method and descriptive-analytical nature. The statistical population is the villages around Lake Urmia. In order to quantitatively analyze the data, the multi-criteria TOPSIS technique was used based on experts' weighting of indicators and criteria.rural resilience. In a separate study of each dimension of livelihood resilience, the results show that in the economic dimension (12 villages have inadequate resilience, 3 villages have moderate resilience and 3 villages have appropriate resilience). In the social dimension (2 villages moderate resilience, 8 villages good resilience and 8 villages poor resilience); in the physical-physical dimension (10 villages poor resilience, 2 villages moderate resilience and 6 villages good resilience) and in the environmental-ecological dimension (14 villages Suitable resilience, 1 village has moderate resilience and 3 villages have poor resilience). In general, in economic (3505) and physical (3945) dimensions, the level of resilience is weak, and in social (4675) and environmental dimensions (5332), Different resilience indices have had different effects on the resilience of villages around Lake Urmia and with changes in the status of these indicators at different levels, the resilience will change and we will see different resilience in the region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • resilience
  • livelihood resilience
  • spatial analysis
  • Lake Urmia
Aryal, K., Prakash Singh Thapa B., Dhananjaya Lamichhane, (2019). Revisiting Agroforestry
for Building Climate Resilient Communities: A Case of Package-Based Integrated
Agroforestry Practices in Nepal, Emerging Science Journal, Available online at
www.IJournalSE.org, Vol. 3, No. 5.
- Cinner, Joshua E, and Michele L. Barnes, (2019). Social Dimensions of Resilience in SocialEcological
Systems,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.08.003.
-Arouri,
A. Nguyen, C. Youssef, A. B., (2012). Natural Disasters, Household Welfare, and
Resilience: Evidence from Rural Vietnam. World Development, Vol. 70, Pp. 59-77.
-Bakhtiari, Sadegh, Sajjadieh, Farzam, (2018). Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Economic
Resilience Index. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 7 (1), 41-53.
-Contreras, D.; Blaschke, T.; & Hodgson, M, (2017). “Lack of spatial resilience in a recovery
process: case L’Aquila, Italy”, Technological forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 121, pp:
76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.010
-Cradock-Henry, N, A. Fountain, J. Buelow, F, (2018). Transformations for Resilient Rural
Futures: The Case of Kaik-oura, Aotearoa-New Zealand, Sustainability, 2018, 10, 1-19.
-Fielke, S.J., W. Kaye-Blake, A. Mackay, W. Smith, J. Rendel, and E. Dominati, (2018).
Learning from resilience research: Findings  from four projects in New Zealand. Land Use
Policy, 70: 322–333.
-Kapur, Rahdhika, (2018). Resource Use and Management of Livelihoods Context in Rural
Households in India, at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324861147.
-Lee, K, C, et all, (2019). Resilience Assessment Workshops: A Biocultural Approach to
Conservation Management of a Rural Landscape in Taiwan, Sustainability, 2020, 12, 408;
doi:10.3390/su12010408, www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability.
-Ma, Libang, Shichun Liu, Yiwen Niu and Meimei Chen, (2018). Village-Scale Livelihood
Change and the Response of Rural Settlement Land Use: Sihe Village of Tongwei County in
Mid-Gansu Loess Hilly Region as an Example, International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health.
-Mabhaudhi, T. (2019). The Water–Energy–Food Nexus as a Tool to Transform Rural
Livelihoods and Well-Being in Southern Africa, International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health. 18;16(16):2970. https://doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162970.  
-Mallick, B., (2019). The Nexus between Socio-Ecological System, Livelihood Resilience, and
Migration Decisions: Empirical Evidence from Bangladesh, sustainability.
-Marchese, D.; Reynolds, E.; Bates, M.; Morgan, H.; Clark, S.; & Linkov, I. (2018). “Resilience 
and Sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications”, 
Science 
of 
the 
total 
Environment, 
pp: 
613-614. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.086 .  
-Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape
and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49.
-Nanki, Kaur et all, (2019). Building resilience to climate change through social protection
Lessons from MGNREGS, India, Climate change; Poverty, Working Paper June 2019.
-Partridge ،  M.D. and Olfert, M.R. and Ali، K, (2019). Towards a Rural Development Policy:
Lessons from the United States and Canada.
-Paudel Khatiwada, Shanta et al, (2018). A Gender Analysis of Changing Livelihood Activities
in the Rural Areas of Central Nepal, Sustainability, 10, 4034; doi:10.3390/su10114034,
www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability. 
-Quandt ,A,  Neufeldt, H.  J., Terrence McCabe, (2019). Building livelihood resilience: what
role 
does 
agroforestry 
play? Climate 
and Development.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2018.1447903. 
-Rahmawati, Isna, Rudiarto, Iwan, (2019). Framework Considerations for Rural Resilience
Toward Land Degradation, UNNES International Conference on Research Innovation and
Commercialization 2018 Volume 2019.
-Sarker, M. N. I, CAO, Q, WU, M, Hossin, M. A, Alam, G. M. M, Shouse, R. C, (2019).
Vulnerability and Livelihood Resillence in the face of natural disaster: A critical conceptuall
review, Sarker et al.: Vulnerability and livelihood resilience in the face of natural disaster –
12770.
-Schouten, M, Vanderheide, M. Heijman, (2009). resilience of social-ecological systems in
European rural areas: theory and prospects, 113th EAAE seminar “the role of knowledge,
innovation and human capital in multifunctional agriculture and territorial rural
development”, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia, December 9-11.
-Wang, N., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., and Li, X. (2018). Adoption of ecofriendly soil-management
practices by smallholder farmers in Shandong Province of China, Soil Science and Plant
Nutrition, 62 (2): 185- 193.