Geographical Engineering of Territory

Geographical Engineering of Territory

Examining the landslide risk in Watershed of Khaniam, Tonekabon , using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Analytical network process (ANP)

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Faculty of Literature and Human sciences, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran
2 MA in Environmental hazards, Department of Geography, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract
To examine the landslide hazard in the area under study, Khanian (located in the West of Mazandaran province and Southeast of Tonekabon), AHP and ANP methods were used. Ten layers including lithology, distance from fault, slope, Aspect, Elevation, land use, distance to road, rainfall, distance to river, and Density of springs are considered as effective factors on the occurrence of landslide.. Study results showed that ANP is more accurate than AHP. Because prioritizing the effective factors in ANP is more sensible and acceptable; meanwhile, concerning the effective factors on landslide in ANP, land slope, land use, and lithology are the most significant factors on landslide development. As, ANP makes it possible to compare the sub criteria. This is also proved by field visits. However, results of AHP reveals that lithology and land use play the most important role in landslide occurrence and its expansion in the area under study and other factors indeed control and intensify the other two factors.
Keywords

Abedini, M., Fathi, M.H. (2014). Landslide risk sensitivity zoning in Khalkhal Chai watershed using multi-criteria models, Quantitative Geomorphological Research,2(4), PP.71-85. [In Persian]

Abedini, M., Rostaei, SH., Fathi, M.H. (2016). Landslides susceptibility mapping using hybrid model of Bayes' theorem & ANP, Case Study: Ahar drainage basin South boundary (From Nasirabad to Sattar Khan dam), Quantitative Geomorphological Research 5(1), pp.142-159. [In Persian]

Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H. (2005). The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65(1),pp: 15–31.
Bin, Y. Yu, M and Yafa, W. (2013). Case Stady Of A giant Debris Fiow In The WenjiGully,  Sichuan Province , China , Natural Hazards ,65(1), pp: 835- 849.
Cevik, E., Topal, T., (2003). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendek (Turkey). Environmental Geology. 44, pp: 949–962.
Chen, X, Chen, W. )2021(. GIS-based landslide susceptibility assessment using optimized hybrid mechine learning methods, Catena,196.
Çimren, E., Çatay, B., Budak, E. ( 2007). Development of a machine tool selection system using AHP, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,35,pp.365-376.
Dai, F.C., Lee, C.F., Li, Jx., Xu, Z.W. (2001). Assessment of landslide susceptibility on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Environmental Geology. 40,pp: 381–391
Ercanoglu, M., Gokceoglu, C. (2002). Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environmental Geology, 41,pp.720-730
Feby, B., Achu, A.L., jimnisha, K., Ayisha, V.A., Reghunath, R. )2020. ( Land slide susceptibility modelling using integrated evidential belief function based logistic regression method: a study from southern western Ghats, India, remote sensing applications: society and environment,20,pp.1-14
Hejazi, S.A., Roostaei, S., Ranjbarianshadbad, M. (2019). Landslide risk assessment and zoning using Vicor model in Hajilerchai catchment, Natural Geography Quarterly,12(44), pp.51-65. [In Persian]
Khajevand, R.) 2015(. Geotechnical- Environmental Study of Landslide in West of Gateh-kash Village in Kojour Area, Noshahr, Journal of Environmental Geology,33(9), pp.47-64. [In Persian]

Kornejady, A., Ownegh, M., Pourghasemi, H.R., Bahremand, A., Motamedi, M. (2020). Landslide susceptibility prediction using the coupled Mahalanobis distance and machine learning models (case study: Owghan watershed, Golestan province),11(2),pp.1-18. [In Persian]

Moazzez, S., Roostaei, SH., Rahimpour, T. (2019). Landslide Hazard Zonation Using ANP model and GIS technique in the Nahand Chai Basin, Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 8(2), PP.23-37. [In Persian]
Moreiras, S.M. (2004). Landslide incidence zonation in the Rio Mendoza valley, Mendoza province, Argentina. Earth Surface Process and  Landforms 29(2), pp:255–266.
Motevali, S. (2018). Landslide zoning in Khanian Tankabon watershed using Winf information value model.,Natural Geography Quarterly,10(36), pp.31-45. [In Persian]
ourghasemi, H.R., Pradhan, B., Gokceoglu, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards, 63, pp:965–996.
Pourghasemi, H. R., Kariminejad, N., Gayen, A., & Komac, M.  (2020). Statistical functions    used for spatial modelling due to assessment of landslide distribution and landscape-interaction factors in Iran. Geoscience Frontiers.11(4), pp.1257-1269.
Rahimpour, T., Roostaei, SH., nakhostinrouhi, M. (2018). Landslide Hazard Zonation Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and GIS A Case Study of Sardool Chay Basin, Ardabil Province,Hydrogeomorphology 4(13), PP.1-20. [In Persian]
Saaty, T. (1991). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research 48(1), pp: 9-26.

Saaty, T.L. (2005). Rank  from  comparisons  and  from  ratings   in  the   analytic  hierarchy/network processes. European Journal of Operational Research,. 168(2),pp: 557–570.

Yalcin, A. (2008). GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena, 72(1), pp:1–12
 
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 12
Summer 2021
Pages 411-427

  • Receive Date 09 January 2021
  • Accept Date 11 June 2021
  • Publish Date 22 June 2022